Methodological Lock-in and the Evaluation of R&D Policies: A Critique to Quasi-experimental Assessments

Bruno Brandão Fischer

Resumen


Technological innovation policies represent a strategic area in the field of public policy, and they are bound to face a continuous process of evaluation in order to analyze their effective contribution, as well as to allow their adaptation to changing economic and social contexts. However, a well-known weakness that many policy and scientific evaluations face in terms of R&D initiatives is that of being purely led by technique or method. In this article I build a criticism towards the widespread use of quasi-experimental assessments in the evaluation of RTD policies, as well as the predominance of regressive statistics in economic analysis. In order to illustrate my arguments I develop a simple empirical approach to the case of the Eureka Program.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


BAYONA-SÁEZ, C.; García-Marco, T. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of the Eureka Program. Research Policy, 39(10), 1375-1386.

BALCONI, M.; Brusoni, S.; Orsenigo, L. (2010). In defence of the linear model: an essay. Research Policy, 39, 1-13.

LEPORI, B. (2006). Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditure: from input to positioning indicators. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 133-143.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.11565/cuocient.v1i2.3



Copyright (c)



Edited by Chimera Innova Group © 2014. All Rights Reserved. Santiago de Chile

The opinions expressed in cuocient are those of the authors and contributors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Chimera Innova Group, the editorial board or the organization to which the authors are affiliated.